The Simple Case For Obama’s Impeachment





impeach

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High crimes and Misdemeanors.

A very simple case can be made for the impeachment and trial of Barack Obama. He has committed a crime worthy of impeachment, one so simple and yet so obvious that no Democrat would dare defend his crime during a Senate Trial.  No liberal talking head or Hollywood celebrity could excuse it either.

It is a crime that he has been committing for so long that there is no one in our country who could excuse what he has done. But first, we need to ask ourselves what did the founders determine is a high crime. Because that will be the only argument the Democrats might use to save him from being convicted and removed from office.

Believe it or not, Andrew Johnson was impeached but not convicted of violating the Tenure in Office Act. It was written to prevent Johnson, a Democrat, from removing from his cabinet Republicans (particularly Edwin Stanton, the Secretary of War) that Lincoln had put in his cabinet, and replacing them with Southern Democrats without the permission of the Senate. Andrew Johnson was impeached by the house, but he was not convicted and removed by the Senate. He was impeached for trying to remove Edwin Stanton and was almost convicted by one vote short of the two thirds majority required to remove a sitting president.

Andrew Johnson’s reasons for removing Stanton were very simple. Stanton, along with General Sherman and several black ministers, came up with a plan to give the freed slaves in the south “40 acres and a mule” to compensate them for their bondage; and Johnson fired him for trying to implement it.  Oddly enough, Johnson was the only senator from a seceded state, Tennessee, to remain in the Senate during the Civil War, and in a stroke of brilliance by Lincoln was chosen as his running mate on the “Grand Union” ticket because he was a Southern Democrat. The sole reason he was impeached and almost convicted was an act written by Congress to protect Lincoln’s Cabinet members from being removed and replaced with Democrats.

Most people don’t realize that Richard Nixon was never impeached; and yet when we think of impeachment of a sitting president, Nixon always comes to mind. Nixon quit rather than put the nation through the spectacle that the Watergate hearings had become. Nixon waited until he had effectively won the war in Vietnam and signed a peace treaty with the North Vietnamese before he did quit. But after he had left, the Democrats in Congress cut off all aid to South Vietnam and signaled to the North that they would allow no US troops to stop their invasion of the South, erasing Nixon’s legacy and condemning South Vietnam to communist oppression.

Bill Clinton was impeached for lying before a Federal Grand Jury in a court case about his sexcapades with various women who sued him for sexual harassment. He escaped conviction and removal because of the actions of a young lawyer and senator from North Carolina by the name of John Edwards, who did the deposition of  Monica Lewinsky for the Senate’s trial. The irony of those actions would not be revealed until Edwards himself ran for President in 2008 against Barack Obama for the Democrat nomination.

Johnson was almost convicted of breaking a law specifically designed by Congress to prevent him from firing Lincoln’s Secretary of War, Nixon was almost impeached for attempting to bug the Democrat Party campaign offices in Washington and covering up his involvement, and Clinton was impeached for lying in court to a Federal grand Jury–but wasn’t convicted because a man with an equal sexual appetite convinced the Senate that everyone lies about sex. To remove Obama from office, what he has to have done has to be so egregious that none can condone it.

Lying about Libya isn’t going to do it. Breaking the War powers act in Yemen, Sudan, Libya, Syria, Pakistan, and other places isn’t going to do it. Spying on millions of Americans without a warrant isn’t going to do it. But what will do it is a crime so simple and yet so massive none will challenge it.

Barack Obama has being using the Social Security number of a dead man. Every piece of paper he has had to put his Social Security number on is an act of fraud against the United States government because that number belongs to Harrison (Harry) Bounel, whose SSN is the one Obama has used his entire life. For whatever reason (and you can be the judge), in 2012, the Social Security Administration refused to identify Harry Bounel’s Social Security Number,  even though Mr. Bounel died in 1981 in Hawaii. The Social Security Administration sought to protect his privacy.

Even now, there is a court case trying to force  this issue into the spotlight and verify that Obama’s Social Security number belongs to someone else. If it succeeds, all hell will break loose; and Obama will have to explain why he has used someone else’s social security number his entire life. And, he could become the first president in our history removed from office through impeachment and conviction.

 





Obama Just Made Free Speech A Felony…





Obama recently signed a bill that gave the Secret Service the right to arrest and charge people at random with a felony.

The bill known as  HR 347 passed through Congress with little objection from either party and was signed by Obama.

In short, anyone protesting in the vicinity of the president or anyone the president deems must be protected by the Secret Service can be arrested on the spot and convicted of a felony. Part of the reason they can is that the Secret Service can decide that an area or building where someone in their protection is at is a “restricted area”; and inside that area, they can arrest you for heckling or protesting Obama. If you are convicted of protesting inside this restricted area or building, you can be sentenced up to ten years in a federal prison, or even sent to Guantanamo.

Before any of you decide that you have to run to Snopes to disprove this is even possible, here is their link….SNOPES HR 347

Snopes, in a hissy fit of credibility, decided to punt this one to a bunch of various legal types, including the ACLU, and then gave it a “Mixture” rating–meaning that it is partly true/partly false in the eyes of the liberal hosts that run Snopes.

Basically, I think they were covering their backsides on this one.

According to them, Gabe Rottman of the ACLU’s Washington Legislative Office opined that this bill did in fact made it easier for the Secret Service to abuse this statute:

H.R. 347 did make one noteworthy change, which may make it easier for the Secret Service to overuse or misuse the statute to arrest lawful protesters. 

Without getting too much into the weeds, most crimes require the government to prove a certain state of mind. Under the original language of the law, you had to act “willfully and knowingly” when committing the crime. In short, you had to know your conduct was illegal. Under H.R. 347, you will simply need to act “knowingly,” which here would mean that you know you’re in a restricted area, but not necessarily that you’re committing a crime. 

Any time the government lowers the intent requirement, it makes it easier for a prosecutor to prove her case, and it gives law enforcement more discretion when enforcing the law.

Think about what he just said: if you know you are in a restricted area and protest Obama, it is not necessary for the government to prove that you knew you were committing a crime, only that you knew where you were or that whoever you were protesting was there.

That, my friends, is what Snopes defines as a middle-of-the-road verdict.

Remember this episode?

Code Pink “willingly and knowingly” illegally crashed the Republican Convention and attempted to rush the stage where Senator John McCain was giving his acceptance speech. The previous version of this statute written in 1971 was in full force at the time, and it was the Secret Service’s responsibility to not only protect John McCain but to arrest Medea Benjamin (the founder of Code Pink) for her actions.

It didn’t happen; the real question is when will Obama use this bill to remove and ARREST anyone who protests him around the country?

If you are Code Pink, one of Obama’s biggest bundlers, you can rest assured that you will be gently asked to leave and escorted to the door.

Let’s just say Code Pink won’t be invited to any Easter Egg rolls on the White House lawn any time soon.

But if you are a member of the Tea Party,  you might be going to jail…

 





Trayvon’s Mom: “Don’t Think For One Second Racial Profiling Doesn’t Happen”





Those are the words of Sybrina Fulton at a discussion at the University of Utah. 

Sybrina Fulton is Trayvon Martin’s mother, and as such seems to be now a bona fide expert on racial profiling.

I’m sorry; that was unfair and sarcastic.

Perhaps she is an expert on raising young black men to avoid conflicts.

In fact, she isn’t an expert on either.

It was her lack of supervision that put Trayvon Martin in Sanford to begin with. It is 250 miles from where Trayvon Martin went to school and where he encountered George Zimmerman; and had his mother been more attentive to the actions of her son, he might still be alive today.

I know that is not going to sit well with many people, but there are several facts this woman ignores as she goes around the lecture circuit telling everyone how her son died from racial profiling.

The most obvious fact is that George Zimmerman is a liberal who is himself part black and has done a number of things that prove he was not the racist Sybrina Fulton or the government would like to portray him as. For one, he was a mentor and a tutor to young black men and took his black sweetheart to the Prom in High School. 

Without that aspect of Racial Profiling, Sybrina Fulton’s gravy train ride comes to a very abrupt halt.

From the testimony in the trial, especially that of  Rachel Jeantel, Trayvon Martin appears to be the aggressor, first attempting to first evade Zimmerman,  then by actually confronting him, and (by physical evidence of Zimmerman’s wounds) attacking Zimmerman (who, according Rachel Jeantel, was called a “creepy assed cracker”.)

Perhaps that is the Racial Profiling that Sybrina Fulton is such an expert on: how to spot white racists on dark rainy nights with your face covered by a hoodie.

Or rather, how to make a right wing white supremacist out of a man who was part black/half Hispanic and all liberal.

The other fact (and there always is yet another facet to these stories) is that Sybrina Fulton was out of Trayvon Martin’s life for almost 14 years and only got custody after his father divorced  Alicia Stanley, the woman who raised  him as a child for 14 years. It was only after moving in with his mother that Trayvon Martin’s life went sour. He was taken away from the woman who raised him and his siblings and given to a mother who was never a part of his life. He turned to drugs and stealing to escape the reality that his father had dumped him with a woman he didn’t know. It was that drug abuse and theft that got Trayvon kicked out of school, and he ran away from his mother in Miami to Sanford where his father lived.

Trayvon either fled Miami to be with his dad, or he fled Miami to escape the wrath of his mother. That he went to Sanford 250 miles away is an established fact, and he didn’t even try to clean up his act when he got there. What he got at the Convenience store was 2/3th of the ingredients for a potent and potentially deadly chemical cocktail called ”Purple Drank” or “Lean.”

So why even give this woman any notice?

For one, she is being used, or rather continually thrust upon us, as an expert in the field of racial profiling and gun crime.

Second, she is riding a gravy train on her own personal guilt trip for failing her son; and that affects the rest of us.

She is being used by this administration as a means to eliminate Florida’s Stand Your ground law, even though that issue was never brought up by either the prosecution or the defense in the Zimmerman case.

She continues to raise the ugly head of racism in a case where it clearly didn’t apply. And finally, she is attempting to profit from her son, when she wasn’t even the woman who raised him.

We cannot ignore what she is doing; but by examining the facts, her motives, and the reasons why she is wrong, we can prevent others from getting caught up in her spiel.

The bittersweet truth is that we owe both Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman the truth.

 





Nine Ways Obama Makes Hitler Look Like An Angel





We are living in perilous times; our nation is being fundamentally transformed into something our founding father’s tried to prevent, an oligarchy.

Oligarchy (from Greek ὀλιγαρχία (oligarkhía); from ὀλίγος (olígos), meaning “few”, and ἄρχω (arkho), meaning “to rule or to command”) is a form of power structure in which power effectively rests with a small number of people. These people could be distinguished by royalty, wealth, family ties, education, corporate, or military control. 

Barack Obama has, through the creation of his many executive czars, established his own set of laws (or rather rules, regulations, and executive “fiats” or Orders) that allow him to usurp Congress’s legislative authority to pass those very laws that govern our lives.

Click here to see the regulations enacted by Obama’s unelected Czars Versus the laws written by Congress in 2013.

This is not the first time a republic has been destroyed this way.

Herr Hitler wasn’t even the president when he had the “Enabling Act of 1933” passed giving him, the Chancellor of the cabinet of the Weimar Republic, the authority to enact legislation without passing it in the “Reichstag,” or the Weimar Republic’s version of our Congress.

We all know how well that turned out.

Obama told us he would do it; remember this?

He promised to “fundamentally change The United States of America”.

What he has done so far:

  • He has created positions in his executive branch for czars that are beyond the approval of Congress.
  • Each of these positions carry the power and authority of a cabinet position, without being responsible to anyone but Obama himself (like Himmler, Goebbels, and the rest of Herr Hitler’s crew.)
  • Each of these positions are empowered by Obama to create any rules and regulations they decide are necessary without going through Congress; in other words, Congress has no say whether these rules are legal under our Constitution.
  • He has created the largest governmental  bureaucracy ever in our country’s history through auspices of Obamacare. (Click here to study the Monster for yourself)  
  • He has been given the power to kill  or imprison anyone, anywhere on the face of this planet without a trial, simply if he decides that person is a threat to this country (or rather his vision of what this country is threatened by.) (NDAA act of 2012)
  • He has created the most intense surveillance of our own citizens ever conceived by man. He has even been spying on Congress.
  • He is providing police departments with military surplus mine-proof vehicles and  weaponry for civil unrest, or “Rescues”.
  • He is well on his way to creating a national security force just like he said he would.
  • Obama has used the IRS to attack his political enemies and their families, particularly the Tea party (and even Sarah Palin’s father.)

Herr Hitler was a rank amatuer compaired to Obama; but then again, Hitler was never a student of Bill Ayers and Saul Alinsky, who wanted to eliminate millions of American citizens just for their political views.

But wait, there’s more….Click here to read Bill Ayers’ own communist manifesto calling for race wars and revolution in this country

Obama is an Alinsky radical to the very core, being molded by Frank Marshall Davis and Bill Ayers and funded by George Soros.

The Alinsky radical has a single principle – to take power from the Haves and give it to the Have-nots. What this amounts to in practice is a political nihilism – a destructive assault on the established order in the name of the
“people” (who, in the fashion common to dictators, are designated as such by the revolutionary elite)

Who is Frank Marshall Davis? He was Obama’s mentor in Hawaii, introduced to him in 1970 by his grandfather. Davis took young Obama into his tutelage and turned him into a man.

 “I admire Russia for wiping out an economic system which permitted a handful of rich to exploit and beat gold from the millions of plain people. . . . As one who believes in freedom and democracy for all, I honor the Red nation.” —FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS, 1947 

Some even believe Davis is actually Obama’s real father, who conceived him with an underaged Ann Dunham during the writing of “Sex Rebel: Black” in which he describes having sex with “Anne,” a common enough name. Except for the nude photographs of Ann Dunham, Obama’s mother, taken by Davis (and the almost eerie resemblance Obama has in common with Davis, especially when compared to Barack Obama Senior.)

The Man who promised to fundamentally change this nation has started doing so with executive orders and rules and regulations from his own personal cadre of the liberal and often communist elites he has installed into positions that cannot be removed from our government by either Congress or the Judiciary.

Change is not always a good thing.

Hitler promised change to the people of Germany. He promised them free health care, the envy of the world; he promised to destroy the rich and raise the poor out of poverty; and he promised to build schools and roads that would change Germany into  the greatest nation on earth.

He did so by surrounding himself with his own Cadre of like-minded people and was given the legislative power to do whatever was necessary to implement what he promised to do for Germany.

There is an axiom of the internet called “Godwin’s law,”  which states:

 “As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches”.

It isn’t always a bad thing to compare some politician’s actions to Herr Hitler; sometimes it is a fair warning of what can and WILL happen next if such abuses of power go unchecked…       

I like to call that “Suhor’s Corollary to Godwin’s law,” Internet patent pending of course…

 





Want To Get Elected? Equate The Tea Party With Rapists…





Abortion is murder; but don’t tell that to Jennifer Wexton, candidate for the Virginia state senate. She believes that opposing abortion is tantamount to rape, and she is proud that she has put a lot of rapists in jails. The coy message here is that she wants to put the Tea Party in jail as well for their beliefs, especially that belief that says a baby in the womb of its mother should be protected from the brutality of abortion.

An unborn child is the most delicate and fragile form of human life that there is, but the proponents of abortion have to hide that fact in a lie (or, rather, several lies.) The first lie is that most abortions are terminating pregnancies caused by rapes and incest.

Here is an abortion “clock” counting the number of abortions since Roe v Wade

When I looked at it, 57 million abortions had been performed since that Supreme Court decision; and if last year’s statistics are an indicator, less than 1% of all abortions performed in the United States are from rape and incest.

All the rest, or 99%, are retroactive birth control by women (and men) who either forgot to perform preemptive birth control or didn’t even try to prevent a pregnancy; and for the opposing of this American genocide, members of the Tea party are likened to the foulest sort of criminals because they want to stop the slaughter of innocents in the womb.

The driving force behind obortions in America was a woman by the name of Margaret Sanger, but you probably already knew that.

But have you ever heard her speak on why she wanted abortions, or read her views on eugenics and minorities?

We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities.  The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.

Margaret Sanger’s December 19, 1939 letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, 255 Adams Street, Milton, Massachusetts.

By the abortion clock, 17 million African-American babies have been killed by abortions. There are only 44 million African Americans in the United States; abortions have killed off a third of the black population of the United States. Liberals, particularly Democrats, are the champions of abortions, especially for the poor black population of our country; and the Tea Party opposes abortions. It is safe to say that the Tea Party places a higher value on human life than the liberals do.

The Tea Party is being portrayed as rapists because they oppose abortions, but the actions of the Democrats and the words of the proponents of abortions are every bit as heinous as those of Adolph Hitler and Josef Stalin.

We are in the midst of an American Genocide, and yet Conservative are portrayed as the criminals for wanting to end these crimes against the most defenseless of our humanity.

Jennifer Wexton wants to be a Virginia state senator so that she can fight for the right to kill children in the womb and stop the Tea party from defending those unborn children regardless of their race, creed, or national origin.