Sequester Lies

Sequester SC Sequester Lies

Liar, liar, Obama is a liar! There is no other way to put it. In an encore, not to the song by the Three Dog Night, but to an earlier article I wrote, Barack Obama stated on a show that the White House did not stop the tours; they had nothing to do with that. Just a few hours after Obama makes that statement on national Television, Jay Carney, the White House Press Secretary states, “The tours are run by the White House, no one else does that.” Can you now say, Liar, liar, Obama’s a liar? How many other times in just the past few months has he come right out and told a bold face lie to the people of the United States? Let us take a quick look. First, Benghazi, where Obama stated for weeks that it was an attack caused by a video placed on U-Tube. Now we know that Obama knew of the truth within hours of the “Terrorist Attack” but continued the LIE because his faithful news media would help him. “Liar, liar, Obama’s a liar!”

It was back in August of 2011 that Obama gave the idea of having a “Sequester” if a debt solution could not be put forth. Now Obama is going out and making statements that the Republicans can stop what he designed. Now let us look at something here, Obama “Orchestrated” the Sequester, now he blames the Republicans but he can fix it if the “Republicans” work with him. Liar, liar, Obama’s a liar! You see it was Obama who came up with the idea of the Sequester. It was a plan from the White House made up to make the “Republicans” look bad when it did happen. Here it actually was not supposed to happen because Obama had it in his head that he would get his way and collect even more taxes. So it kind of backfired on him.

Now fast forward to today and all the alleged cuts that are going to happen due to the “Republicans” not doing what Obama wants! That should stick out in your mind; “not doing what Obama wants.” You see this all goes back to his fixation with Karl Marx and his desire back in the 1980′s to cause civil unrest and destroy the United States so he, Obama, can lead the people out of the mess he created! Remember this from an interview with one of the few people that have ever come forward to discuss Obama’s ideology while he was at Occidental College in the 1980′s? (LP-Leon Puissegur; Dr. Drew-Dr. John Drew)

LP; “During that time did Obama display the Marxist ideology?”

Dr. Drew; “We were confiding in each other the way people fight with each other people with major historical struggles in communicating, very down to earth, very honest. Like I said, I am ashamed of my Socialist/Marxist past, I have a conversion story which explains how I became a Christian, Constitutional Conservative. Barack Obama has no conversion story. There is a story about how he stopped being a Marxist, if anything his career, life shows an alarming consistency in his ideological extremism.”

LP; “Do you see the same Marxist ideology now with Barack Obama?”

Dr. Drew; “Yes, especially when he talks about the people holding on to their guns and religion because of economic stress. That is a Marxist idea. Everything he says about it being a good idea to spread the wealth around; that is Marxist/Socialist concepts. Some of the statements Obama makes about things inevitably get better, I think that is a Marxist ideological remnants.”

Read the entire interview here.

Yes, Obama is doing just what he was trained to do while he was at Occidental College. Obama has just learned to lie a bit more and use the news media which he has bought and paid for to the max! It must be stated here that Obama is just the leader in a larger operation now calling itself the “Progressive caucus” and this is the new name of the Socialist Party of America. They also call themselves the Democratic Socialist Party, (DSA).

From www.discoverthenetworks.com:

“DSA today describes itself as “the principal U.S. affiliate of the Socialist International” and ranks as the largest socialist organization in the United States. Its members seek to build “progressive movements for social change while establishing an openly socialist presence in American communities and politics.” “We are socialists,” reads the organization’s boilerplate, “because we reject an international economic order sustained by private profit, alienated labor, race and gender discrimination, environmental destruction, and brutality and violence in defense of the status quo.” “To achieve a more just society,” adds DSA, “many structures of our government and economy must be radically transformed.” A major hallmark of such transformation would be an “equitable distribution of resources.”

Obama will do all he can to help these people take over the United States and turn it into a Socialist regime so he can be known as the President that helped them do so. Once again, Obama is a liar. Obama declares that he will “…preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States,” but in reality he does not want the United States to survive his term. Liar, liar, Obama’s a liar!

Just this past January, everyone had an increase in their taxes. It was done as a special help by Barack Obama himself by forcing the Republicans to cave into his demands to do so and add a tax upon the rich. But once again, Obama is a liar. Remember that Obama said he would never raise taxes upon the middle class, but just after he was sworn into office, he did just that! Obama also said that no one would have to change their doctors, but now many are having to do just that because their doctors will not see them due to Obamacare. Obama has shown himself to be a huge liar. It seems that nearly all Obama has stated somehow comes back as a huge lie! Is it any wonder we can call him a liar?

None Dare Call It… Treason

Obama Forward SC 690x1024 None Dare Call It… Treason

Today, our nation is facing perhaps the most critical situation it has faced since 1776 when our nation declared our Independence! Our very Constitution is being attacked by a man who has taken an oath of office to “…preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States” and also by those who have taken an oath to “support and defend” that same Constitution. Yet, some elected representatives find it in their best interest to refuse to honor their Oath of Office. We the people had sent these senators and representatives to their office with the idea that they would be trusted with our Constitution. But instead, they betray the very principles of their office. Some lay claim that this is an act of treason. With this in mind, let us look at just what treason is defined as.

Treason is defined by Webster’s online as:

1. the betrayal of trust; 2. the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance or to kill or personally injure the sovereign or his family.

The 1828 Webster’s Dictionary, which many would use to define words pertaining to the Constitution and the Founding Fathers, defines Treason as:

Treason is the highest crime of a civil nature of which a man can be guilty. Its signification is different in different countries. In general, it is the offense of attempting to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance, or of betraying the state into the hands of a foreign power. In monarchies, the killing of the king, or an attempt to take his life, is treason. In England, to imagine or compass the death of the king, or of the prince, or of the queen consort, or of the heir apparent of the crown, is high treason; as are many other offenses created by statute.

Understanding what the definition of treason is, let us see just what our elected officials in Washington are doing with the Second Amendment and see if whether they are in fact committing an act of treason.

Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Let us list those officials who have now committed acts of treason by their actions and words: President Barack Obama, with his signing of unconstitutional executive orders contrary to the Constitution; Vice president Joe Biden, with his words making an attempt to change opinion of the Constitution; and Attorney General Eric Holder, with his words and his strong statements against the very oath he took. We cannot forget Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and her deliberate attempt to classify weapons that are now legal under the Constitution. Here we must present some idea of why “We The People” do not have to abide by any laws made that are in direct conflict with the Second Amendment and State laws.

Even Attorney General Eric Holder has made statements that are contrary to his oath of office.

In a 1995 address to the Woman’s National Democratic Club, Holder announced the launch of a public campaign to “really brainwash people into thinking about guns in a vastly different way.”

“What we need to do,” he explained, “is change the way in which people think about guns, especially young people, and make it something that’s not cool, that it’s not acceptable, it’s not hip to carry a gun anymore, in the way in which we changed our attitudes about cigarettes.”

Holder also advanced the notion that “Every day that goes by, about 12, 13 more children in this country die from gun violence”—a statistic that would be true only if one classified 18-year-old, gun-wielding gangsters as “children.” In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, Holder wrote an opinion piece for The Washington Post calling for a new law that would give the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms “a record of every firearm sale.” He also advocated that prospective gun buyers be checked against the secret “watch lists” compiled by the government.

In 2008, Holder argued that “the Second Amendment did not protect an individual right to keep and bear arms” but only protected government militias’ rights to guns. Scholar and political commentator John Lott writes that he “can’t find even one gun control law that Holder has opposed.”

Even Vice President Joe Biden made very serious statements that are not at all reasonable when he stated “You don’t need an assault rifle to stop an intruder, you just need a double barrel shotgun with ammunition, the assault weapon is not as accurate as a shotgun.” Here it seems that Biden has never been in a situation where the so-called “assault weapon” was used against several people attacking a single individual where that individual overcame the number of people attacking them.

Here, it becomes very clear that those who present unconstitutional laws do not uphold the very Constitution they swore an oath to support and defend. In doing so, all those who take a stand counter to the Constitution are people committing treason and making laws that cannot be upheld because they are unconstitutional. This must stop, and these people must be held accountable for what they have done.

How can “We The People” even think of stopping these types of treasonous actions by the people we elected to serve? We as a nation must come to understand the true assaults that are now being made upon our nation by those sworn to support and defend our Constitution. We as a people must and should do all we can to ensure that the Constitution is not destroyed.

God help us all before it is too late!

(Editor’s note: A longer version of this article appeared at Freedom Outpost.)

Photo credit: Dave Merrick

 

When Politicians Demand Gun Control, Remember Our Founders

Many are asking the question “Why should we allow guns?” Those who want gun control at the levels that Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) has put forth have the idea that citizens do not need certain types of weapons. However, those same people will be very quick to say that our government will never turn on the very people they intend on keeping from acquiring these arms. Just by placing the “assault weapons ban” bill on the record, Senator Feinstein has violated the Oath of her office (and as such has committed an act of treason.)

Now back in 1946, a local sheriff had developed a political machine that had taken over the area known as Athens, Tennessee. The political machine had forced people to leave the voting booth, and those who opposed them faced a beating for their oppposition. Now had the gun control ideology of present day been in effect in 1946, the people of Athens would not have been able to take back the ballot boxes that were about to be filled with fraudulent ballots by those who had taken over the town of Athens. There is a plaque showing that a number of World War 2 veterans stood up for their fundamental rights of a fair election; but this was done due to a very powerful part of the United States Constitution, the Second Amendment. An interesting video was made about this action taken by the Citizens of Athens, Tennessee, which displays that the government not only can, but did, go way out of control.

It should not only be watched but shown to all who have the false idea that the government would not go beyond the law.

It has become a very dark day within the United States today when the Senator from California presents a bill that really does nothing at all that would help ensure that another Sandy Hook massacre does not happen (but does infringe on the Second Amendment rights of law abiding citizens.) No one has addressed the root of the problem at all; instead, they go after the legal gun owners. Senator Feinstein has forgotten that Lanza had broken about 20+ laws before even going to the school. She also seems to forget that the man had a very serious mental problem and that if he had been under watch, he would have been stopped from stealing his mother’s guns (not to mention breaking nearly every gun control law on the books in Connecticut.)

Many people will quickly and wrongly say that the Second Amendment was never meant to allow people to have weapons like those now attempting to be banned, but they are totally wrong. When we look back at many of the statements by the men who started the United States and signed the Constitution, we see the exact opposite of what is being put forth in the legislative process today.

“(The Constitution preserves) the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation… (Where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.” –James Madison

“The right of the people to keep and bear…arms shall not be infringed. A well-regulated militia, composed of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country…” 
–James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434 (June 8, 1789)

“A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well-digested plan is requisite; and their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories as tend to render them independent of others for essential, particularly military, supplies.” – George Washington

“What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms.” – Thomas Jefferson

“Those who beat their swords into plowshares usually end up plowing for those who didn’t.
” – Ben Franklin

“When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.” – Thomas Jefferson

“The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed.” 
– Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers

These great men either wrote, signed, or fought for the Constitution of the United States; and their words show clearly what they had in mind with the Second Amendment. It was with such forethought that they knew that if the people were properly armed, they would “preserve” liberty and freedom. This cannot be denied, and any individual who acts against the Second Amendment acts in a way that should be declared as treason against the very Constitution they took an oath to “support and defend”!

It has come down to “We the People” to preserve the founders’ ideology and not be drawn into the extreme Socialistic views of the far left “progressive” party.

It also must be stated that it is very bad to kill children; but our nation allows the murder of 4,000 children every day through abortion, and very little is done about that. They have heartbeats at 4 days, but our government has legalized their premeditated murder. With this in mind, why is it that our nation seems to take such strong action for 26 people being killed by guns when the very people crying about the innocent children being killed will turn a blind eye to 4,000 being killed each day?

While the issue in Athens, Tennessee was about a ballot box and fraudulent voting, the issue in America today is about much more; and there is far more at stake. However, in the end, the same problem exists; there are lawless men and women who wish to force their ideology on the people by undermining and even directly attacking the United States Constitution.

 

 

Top Gun Grabbers In The House Of Representatives Exposed

Bobby Rush Official Portrait 112th Congress Top Gun Grabbers In The House Of Representatives Exposed

We as a people seem to now be wondering if our Congress will ever do anything right. We saw the article posted by Tim Brown entitled “Ten New Gun Bills Introduced On First Day of Congress”. We then began reading, only to see names that looked funny doing this, so we looked up to find out just who these people are that have placed such bills on the floor of the House. Strange to say, the first one by Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-NY) is purely due to what happened to her life. Her husband was shot back in 1993; and since then, gun laws have come and gone with no difference at all made, except possibly for the worst. It has to be noted that the individual who killed Rep. McCarthy’s husband had already broken several laws, so how are any additional laws going to stop people from obtaining guns or other weapons?

The next two Representatives that introduced bills, Bobby Rush (D-IL) and Rush Holt (D-NJ), seem to have questionable pasts! It seems that Bobby Rush is a member of the Democratic “Progressive” party. Now this, by itself, brings into the picture some very concerning questions about just who is being elected to the House of Representatives. Bobby Rush is a member of a group that has very close ties to the Institute for Policy Studies and the Democratic Socialists of America. The many times-called “Progressive” party is another name for the Democratic Socialist Party of America! Now many people either seem not to be bothered by that, or they are just plain dumb! Here in lies the problem, a group of people who do not have the Constitution at heart and actually wish to destroy the Constitution. We cannot state what Representative Holt is a part of; but if Holt is with Rush, it would seem to indicate that Holt also supports the Socialist Democratic Party.

The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) was founded in 1991 by Bernie Sanders, a self-identified socialist who had recently been elected to the U.S. House of Representatives. Sanders’ CPC co-founders included House members Ron Dellums, Lane Evans, Thomas Andrews, Peter DeFazio, and Maxine Waters. The Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) was also involved in CPC’s founding and in Caucus activities thereafter; IPS continues to advise CPC on various matters to this day.

So let us look at what we have here so far: we see that at least two people here have “special’ interests at heart, and those interests have seemed to make them forget about their Oath of Office in which they swore to uphold the Constitution. Yet they are now introducing bills that are in direct conflict with the Constitution! Maybe this is why our nation is so messed up right now; we have people in office who just do not understand what the Constitution really means.

Now let us get back to Rep. Bobby Rush; now here is a real strange apple in the cart. Let us begin with the following given once again at the only site that shows the Socialists for who they are, www.discoverthenetworks.com; Bobby Rush is shown as:

-Democratic Member of Congress
-Member of the Progressive Caucus
-In 1968, went AWOL from the U.S. Army
-Co-founder of the Illinois branch of the Black Panther Party
-In 1969, served six months in jail for an illegal weapons conviction
-Advocates reparations for African Americans

Here it is shown that Bobby Rush had a 6-month jail term for an illegal weapons conviction in 1969! But this was during the time that Bobby Rush was also, what his “Socialist” friends would call him, the “Deputy Minister of Defense’! We have to wonder if maybe Obama would place him somewhere in his Administration since he has held a high office? Of course, he now disavows his past with the Black Panthers.

Rush was born in November 1946 in Albany, Georgia but grew up on Chicago’s North Side, where his mother was a Republican precinct captain. While serving in the U.S. Army from 1963-1968, Rush became involved with the radical Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee. In 1968, he went AWOL (Absent Without Official Leave) from the military and co-founded the gangster-ridden Illinois branch of the Black Panther Party (BPP), renowned for intimidating local business people into making “donations” to Panther “charities.” One BPP member recruited by Rush was Fred Hampton, who was killed in a December 4, 1969 police raid on Panther headquarters.

In 1969 Rush served six months in jail for an illegal weapons conviction. In 1971, his comrades were still describing him as the “Deputy Minister of Defense” for the BPP’s Illinois chapter. In 1992, the socialist magazine “In These Times” would praise Rush, who was by then a fledgling congressional candidate, as someone who “has continued to support progressive policies and has never disavowed his Panther past.”

We have to wonder just how could someone with a criminal background like this and with such a deep-rooted and hate-filled past be elected to the House of Representatives where laws are made and discussed? But Bobby Rush shows what he is after in his own words.

As a member of both the Progressive Caucus and the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC), Rush is among the strongest congressional supporters of reparations for the descendants of African-American slaves. “The future of race relations will be determined by reparations for slavery,” Rush once told a congressional hearing.

Now, given Bobby Rush’s own words, it is clear just what he is looking for: reparations for slavery. In other words, he wants money for nothing. He even stated here that future race relations would be about reparations! Is this the kind of man we should have making laws for our nation?

In 1999, Rush’s 29-year-old son Huey Rich was shot and killed. “My son’s death was a senseless death,” he told supporters the following day at Jesse Jackson’s Operation PUSH headquarters. “We’ve got to rid our communities of guns.”

Instead of finding out why his son was killed, he just goes after the guns when guns were not what caused the killing. But wait: he goes before Jesse Jackson’s Operation PUSH. Rush gives a speech to these people; now this shows his connection to the far left of which the Socialist/Marxist/ Communist lay in wait. Jackson is also an open Socialist and proud of it.

Rush’s most noteworthy congressional race took place in 2000, when he defeated then-state senator Barack Obama in the Democratic Primary. During the campaign, Rush said: “Barack Obama went to Harvard and became an educated fool. Barack is a person who read about the civil-rights protests and thinks he knows all about it.”

Is this amazing where he calls Obama a fool? This representative is a prime example of what is wrong with our Congress today! Our nation has gone from being a proud display of the Constitution to one that seems to “tolerate” the Socialists/Communists/Marxists that have infiltrated our government!

During his legislative career, Rush has voted:

-against the development of a national missile defense system;
-against requiring hospitals to report (to the federal government) illegal aliens who receive emergency medical treatment;
-against separate proposals calling for the construction of some 700 miles of fencing to prevent illegal immigration along America’s southern border;
-against a proposal to grant state and local officials the authority to investigate, identify, and arrest illegal immigrants;
-against major tax cut proposals in September 1998, February 2000, March 2000, July 2000, May 2001, May 2003, October 2004, and May 2006;
-against separate welfare reform bills designed to move people off the welfare rolls and into paying jobs;
-in favor of prohibiting oil and gas exploration in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR);
-against a proposal to fund offshore oil exploration along the Outer Continental Shelf.

Bobby Rush seems to vote against all that would help the very people he depended upon to get elected!

Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX) also put forth gun control legislation on the first day of the 113th Congress. She seems to have the idea that people over 21 would not go out and steal a gun and go on a bloody rampage. Now what is wrong with that? First off, it would not matter what age the law would cover simply because should a criminal wish to do harm to anyone, they would not have any problem breaking the law to do it! Her bill has to be one of the most stupid ideas since it would not stop anything at all; and if that would become a law, it would have to be circumvented for the service men and women! How dumb would that be?

Representative Sheila Jackson Lee is:

-Congresswoman representing the 18th District of Texas, downtown Houston
-Member of the Progressive Caucus
-Member of the Congressional Black Caucus

Lee belongs to the Progressive Caucus and the Congressional Black Caucus in the House of Representatives. Americans for Democratic Action consistently rates her voting record as 95-to-100 percent on the left side of legislation.

It seems that this lady is very smart, well, in her own mind anyway, because she has made that statement to her underlings. Per discoverthenetworks.com:

Over the course of her political career, Lee has earned a reputation for having both an entitlement mentality and a volatile temper. In 1998, for example, she was accustomed to having an aide drive her daily, in a government-leased car, back and forth between her Capitol Hill apartment and her congressional office one block away. One day, she told a staffer who had failed to reserve a limousine: ‘You don’t understand. I am a queen, and I demand to be treated like a queen!’

What else has this lady done? What we reveal is not made up; it is factual and on the record. The following all comes from Congressional records and from www.discoverthenetworks.com.

In July 2010, Lee wrongly stated, from the floor of the House of Representatives, that North and South Vietnam had managed to forge a peaceful relationship with one another in the years since the Vietnam War. (In fact, South Vietnam ceased to exist on July 2, 1976, when North and South were merged to form the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.) Said Lee:

Today we have two Vietnams, side by side, North and South, exchanging and working. We may not agree with all that North Vietnam is doing, but they are living in peace. I would look for a better human rights record for North Vietnam, but they are living side by side.

That same month, Lee spoke at an NAACP meeting where she derided the Tea Party movement as a racist phenomenon, saying:

All those who wore [Klansman] sheets a long time ago have now lifted them off and started wearing [applause], uh, clothing, uh, with a name, say, I am part of the Tea Party. Don’t you be fooled. [voices: "That's right.", applause] Those who used to wear sheets are now being able to walk down the aisle and speak as a patriot because you will not speak loudly about the lack of integrity of this movement.

In a January 2011 floor debate over a Republican bill (HR2) calling for repeal of the recently passed national healthcare reform legislation, Lee said that such a repeal would violate the Constitution:

The Fifth Amendment speaks specifically to denying someone their life and liberty without due process. That is what H.R. 2 does and I rise in opposition to it. And I rise in opposition because it is important that we preserve lives and we recognize that 40 million-plus are uninsured. Can you tell me what’s more unconstitutional than taking away from the people of America their Fifth Amendment rights, their Fourteenth Amendment rights, and the right to equal protection under the law?

One should ask why this lady is even in Congress, if she cannot understand what she is doing, much less has her history totally out of whack! It is like she and the rest of the Socialists are in a totally separate world and merely pop into ours to introduce laws that would have no bearing upon any sort of action to stop people from breaking the laws to get guns and kill people.

We have shown with just these people here just what Congress is facing today; and if “We The People” do not wake up soon, we will find ourselves being totally dominated by a bunch of Socialist/Communist people who have destroyed the Constitution and replaced it with the Communist Manifesto!

Here is the bunch that offered eight gun control bills on the first day of the new Congress. Yes, they have an agenda!