Supreme Court Same Sex Marriage Ruling Triggers Judicial Impeachment Movement

Remember when fairy tales ended with a monogamous couple consummating their marriage with a wedding kiss as we watched for the bride to lift up her foot up signaling they would live happily ever after?

Well, the Supreme Court has just murdered that tradition. Its dark prince majority threw daggers through the heart of the millennium-honored institution, mocking its sacred origins in order to join together men with men and women with women.

Leading up to this decision, lower courts levied draconian fines at business owners who dared to cling to their so-called “outdated” traditional values.

One such judge recommended a $135,000 fine against family business bakers Aaron and Melissa Klein of Sweet Cakes By Melissa in Gresham, Oregon, for refusing to inscribe a pro-same-sex marriage slogan on the top of a wedding cake.

So, let me ask you a question: Regardless of whether you consider yourself to be a conservative, moderate, libertarian, or liberal, do you really think it’s right or fair for a small family business to get nailed with an eighth of a million dollar fine– just for exercising their first amendment rights?

Remember when activists put on their nice face, portraying same-sex marriage as being so sugary sweet? Who on earth would want to be such an intolerant ‘hater’ as to deny true love to be extended to same-sex couples?

But today, we are seeing who the true intolerant haters are: those who refuse to allow others to hold to their traditional values–and even go so far as to ruin their lives for simply exercising their first amendment rights.

Baker Melissa Klein gave her 17 word unassailable defense as: “Being a baker, the cake is our canvas and we get to put our artwork on it.” But the judge didn’t see it that way.

But rather than capitulate to the tyranny of the truly intolerant, Aaron and Melissa Klein closed shop as a matter of conscience.

Regardless how morals factor into this topic, let’s look at this from a practical matter: what kind of impact will this sort of newfangled cultural renaissance have on our economy? Ask yourself: will this boost the economy, shutting down traditionalists? And will it boost or lose jobs?

Lest we forget, it was small businesses like bakeries that helped build the United States into the largest economy in world history.

But God is not mocked. If aberrant lifestyles are continually foisted upon our national backbone that once made America stand tall, we will soon become decrepit and hunched over–and die a much deserved death as a nation.

So here’s the challenge, for ‘We the People’ to stand up against tyranny. It’s not free speech. It’s not love. It’s not tolerance. It’s tyranny. And no matter what the Supreme Court calls it, it’s not marriage. Congress now must muster the courage to impeach those Supreme Court justices, just as Associate Justice Samuel Chase was impeached in 1805.

Please forward a link to this video to anyone you know who still has a backbone. Thank you.

NOTE: Activist Gregg Jackson is now calling for the impeachment of morally rogue justices. Contact him:

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

Bruce Jenner Vs. Bride Of Frankenstein: One Had A Choice

The world’s largest Internet Evangelist, Bill Keller, just preached a sermon, saying that the only difference between Bruce “Caitlyn” Jenner and the Bride of Frankenstein is that Frankenstein’s creation didn’t have a choice!

Reverend Keller, who has 2.5 MILLION online congregant subscribers to his daily cyber sermons, stated: “The Bride of Frankenstein was a fictitious evil creation meant to equate man with God, the ONLY one who can create life! Bruce ‘Caitlyn’ Jenner is a real live person who also is attempting to equate himself with God, since God created him as a man; and no amount of surgery, make-up, media hype, or new names will ever change that!”

What’s more, Keller said: “Just as there is no such thing as a ‘gay’ man or a ‘lesbian’ woman since a person chooses to engage in perverted, unnatural unhealthy sexual relations with people of the same sex. It’s not an involuntary reaction like when a doctor taps your knee with a hammer.”

Keller added that: “There also is no such thing as a ‘transgendered’ person. It is simply a man or woman so lost in confusion that they are trying to turn themselves into the opposite gender God created them to be.”

Keller reflected: “Like most Americans, I cheered as US Olympic Decathlete Bruce Jenner won that event in the 1976 Montreal Olympics, and received the title that goes to the victor as being the world’s greatest athlete. And now he trades in that legacy for this?”

Keller lamented: “What disgusts me most about this sad freak show, is the open acceptance by a majority of the population and the news media, including Fox News, and how they are in full glory praising and supporting Jenner’s perversion. And how dare they condone the homosexual lobby telling children as young as age 2 that they are not the gender God created them to be!”

Reverend Bill Keller’s video sermons on this topic and others are available to view on his web site at:

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

Chelsea Clinton And Family Were Paid $26 Million For Speeches!

Chelsea Clinton, plus her mom and dad, got paid more than $26 MILLION for giving speeches? If this isn’t money laundering, I do’t know what is.

Got a cause you want promoted or need favor in high places? Simple. Hire Chelsea or one of her parents to give a speech to 10 people in the audience, pay them a million bucks or so, and watch your troubles disappear.

And speaking of disappearing, watch how quickly the money in the so-called Clinton Foundation charity disappears and reappears in the Hilary Presidential campaign in a form of political accounting that would make even the most shameless Hollywood movie bookkeepers blush.

Don’t believe it? Well, under extreme pressure, the Clintons finally broke down and disclosed the money-for-speeches-for-favors scheme on their web page. A Beijing natural gas group paid $250,000 for a pep talk. Citbank paid more than a quarter million for some wisdom from Hillary. And a Nigerian newspaper paid a half million dollars for one of the Clintons to have a conversation with them.

The Washington Times reports the Clintons raked in more than $25 million in shake down–I mean speaking–fees in the past 16 months. Yes, that’s months, not years! And the Clinton Foundation has brought in a whopping $2 BILLION since Bill Clinton left office.

With ethics like this, is it any wonder that millions of acres of barren American wasteland that just happens to be rich in oil reserves has been forcibly converted into no-drilling so-called wildlife zones? And is it any wonder why top-secret American nuclear technology was so quickly given away to China?

Conflicts of interest abound. And much of this slush funding still has not been disclosed on the Clinton web site, probably because a number of the big bucks, tax exempt ‘charitable contributions’ violated legal limits such as their acceptance of $500,000 from Algeria.

And last week, Bill Clinton under pressure, was forced to admit to receiving over $100 MILLION for giving speeches from 2001 until 2012. If this is what he admits to, can you imagine how much more money and additional favors and untraceable gifts he and Hillary received?

And Chelsea personally raked in huge money from nine different organizations. And what kind of organizations are buying favor and clout from the Clintons? Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, and others who are giving payback for the massive multi-billion dollar taxpayer-funded bailout of banks we were told were too big to fail.

Question: Is Hillary Clinton too big to be held to the same legal and ethics rules the rest of us great unwashed masses are held to?

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

Vince Vaughn: Most PRO-GUN Actor In Hollywood!

When movie star and comedian Vince Vaughn says he’s pro-gun, he isn’t joking. In fact, he’s got to be the most pro-gun actor in Hollywood.

The star of Wedding Crashers and HBO’s True Detective, with both guns blazing, in a British GQ interview said a few interesting things.

“We have the right to bear arms to resist the supreme power of a corrupt and abusive government,” snapped Vaughn, adding, “It’s well known that the greatest defense against an intruder is the sound of a gun hammer being pulled back.”

No, mind you, Vince isn’t acting here. These are his words, not a script. Oh, and it gets better with Vinnie’s passionate tirade about school shootings: “Take mass shootings. They’ve only happened in places that don’t allow guns. In all of our schools it is illegal to have guns on campus, so again and again these guys go and shoot up these bleepin’ schools (expletive deleted) because they know there are no guns there.”

While we’re not sure what backlash there will be in Hollywood over Vince Vaughn making his positions clear, Gun Owners of America’s Erich Pratt applauded Vaughn’s comments, saying: “If everyone in Southern California adopted Vince Vaughn’s position on self defense, the only shootings we might see in Los Angeles would be on Hollywood movie lots when the director yells: Action.”

Pratt concluded his remarks with this quip: “With rock solid 2nd Amendment champions like Vince Vaughn, there may be hope for Hollywood yet!”

For more Second Amendment Rights articles like this or to sign up for email alerts, visit the web site of Gun Owners of America at:

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

Detroit Dems Blame GOP For Water Cutoff

Detroit: we have a water problem. In case you hadn’t heard, at the end of May 2015, the City of Detroit made the historic decision to cut off water to residents behind on their water bills–$50 million behind.

The angry masses are looking for someone to point their fingers at. So, slippery Detroit Democrat leaders are blaming Republicans for being forced to shut off water to their constituents.

But when questioned how Democrats can still be blame-shifting after Detroit has had more than 53 years of consecutive Democrat rule, the Detroit Democrat Party leadership’s collective attitude could be paraphrased as follows:

“Before we ran those blasted Republicans out of office in 1962, they messed up Detroit so badly that we’re still recovering. We can’t even keep the water running from all their mess-ups.”

For the record, the last Republican Mayor in Detroit was Louis Mirianii. He was born in 1897 in the early days of Vaudeville, serving as mayor from 1957 until 1962. That was so long ago, we couldn’t even find a color picture of his honor!

Today, Democrat Mayor Mike Duggan presides over Detroit–the largest city in history to file for bankruptcy. But he prefers to focus attention on the city of Baltimore, which surpassed 100 shootings in May of 2015 and also is sending water shut-off notices.

Hmm…so what do Democrat Baltimore and Democrat Detroit have collectively besides water bill collection problems? 100 years of Democrat rule!

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth