Two years ago, available public evidence suggested a likelihood of Huma Abedin – now Huma Weiner – and Hillary Clinton having, shall we say, “an unusually close relationship.”
This evidence began to surface in 2007 when rumors about the Huma/Hillary relationship being more than the “close colleague” kind floated around the halls of Washington. A logical question took shape: “If Hillary is bisexual (as) had long been thought (and occasionally uttered in public), what is the nature of her relationship with the dark eyed enchanting Abedin, a young lady from a strict Muslim family?”
Although they were never asked publicly, the initial question led to a few less salacious and more concrete questions about Huma.
“Is the fact that Huma was never seen twice in the same designer outfit and lived in a $649,000 condo explainable because she was trading sexual favors with Hillary for a fabulous lifestyle?” “If so what does that make Huma?” “What does that say about Hillary Clinton?”
“How did Huma, whose government salary was listed as $9,999, live as she did?”
In 2007, gay Village Voice columnist Michael Musto speculated that Hillary might have been “Gayle King-ing” Huma (that is, getting her out of the shadows, thereby heading off questions about a “secret” nature to their relationship. )
Although Huma’s husband Anthony “Tone the Bone” Weiner’s run for mayor of New York is in full stride, the jackals in the media so far have been content to focus on his naked internet pictures. But if the pictures don’t end Weiner’s march to victory, the media may have to start asking these questions.
Nevertheless, these questions, at least those dealing with Huma’s lavish lifestyle while she “worked” for Hillary at the State Department, have resurfaced. Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), one of the few Republicans with any courage, is beginning to ask how Huma financed her lifestyle while under Hillary. He has sent a letter to current Secretary of State John Kerry and Huma demanding answers.
Maybe Hillary and Huma never shared a lesbian embrace; but can we say that anything is beyond this bunch given what we’ve learned in the last two years? If this WAS the case, it would explain a lot about Hillary’s attitude and policies toward what went on in the Middle East during her watch.