Economics 101 For Black College Students

School1 300x225 Economics 101 for Black College Students

Photo Credit: kjarrett (Creative Commons)

 

They attend schools whose faculties hate and fear the free market. They couldn’t wait to run to the polls to vote for “Brother Barack.” Once he was elected all of their troubles would be over and they could join him and his Party in rubbing the “oppressive” White majority’s face in the dirt; or so the students at America’s “historical Black colleges” thought.

Like virtually every other group that joined Barack Obama’s coalition and worked to get him elected, students at America’s Black colleges – which sport some of the worst graduation rates in the country – have been screwed by their Messiah.

Because the new system of doling out college loans is built on actual credit checks for locatable parents, many Black students are learning economics lessons without ever setting foot in a classroom.

The loans that have been most difficult for Obama’s fans are federal student loans from a program called PLUS. The problem for Obama’s fans is that PLUS loans demand proving you have a financial history of actually paying back past loans and don’t have your picture on the wall at your local collection agency.

It really doesn’t matter to Obama and his administration that the students being denied PLUS loans worked their hearts out for Obama’s elections. That was yesterday.

The National Association for Equal Opportunity in Higher Education, an organization that works for Black college students, says that in just the first year of these news regulations 15,000 denial letters went out and only about 15% of these decisions were successfully appealed. In only the first two months of this year almost double that number have been turned down.

Cold reality can be especially cruel when it unexpectedly visits those who have spent a lifetime looking to government for everything. Being asked to meet standard requirements, when such things have always applied to someone else, is a lesson about being careful for whom you vote that the facilities at these schools don’t understand, let alone ever want to teach. Not to worry though, the free market they all so deeply hate and fear has taken care of that. Lesson taught; lesson learned.

Sources:

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/05/02/190246/loan-program-change-leads-to-enrollment.html#.UYPkSEpc1Pw

Why Boston Was Attacked Is Only Hard To Figure Out If We Deny The Truth

boston marathon explosion 300x168 Why Boston was attacked is only hard to figure out if we deny the truth

Since last week when the Obama Administration and its media were forced to acknowledge the bombing in Boston was a terrorist act NOT carried out by the TEA party or the Klu Klux Klan, but rather by adherent Muslims, we have heard a stream of verbal gymnastics trying to absolve the murderers and somehow blame America for the carnage in Boston.

We’ve heard from the Muslim apologist crowd – bearded fake intellectuals with pipes, elbow patches and the like – speaking in a halting meter to make it seem like every word is worth carving on Mount Rushmore.

Their sophistry, saying “who radicalized them?” and “young men struggling to fit into a strange new culture” or “just young men trying to be heard” does us no good.

What we need now is truth not feel good, “all cultures have good and bad” relativism.

Only the truth can help us learn from what has happened – lies don’t cut it. The truth is these two punks fell for the lies in the Qur’an’s verses of the sword.

These verses told them to kill non Muslins (2:191-193) (2:244) (2:216) ( 3:56) and commit any number of criminal acts in the name of the so-called “religion of peace.”

The word “terror” is actually in the qur’an (surah 8-12) in the common meaning of the word: “Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers…”

Surah 4:74 exalts Muslims to do battle with “non-believers” secure in the knowledge that if they are killed they will be rewarded in paradise, thus providing the grounds for educated Muslims to talk the uneducated Muslim into becoming suicide bombers.

In keeping with the general tone of subtle deception in the Qur’an “allah” orders faithful Muslims to kill and maim those who are enemies. Surah 5:33 says, “they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides…” This is why the ball bearing bombs were arranged so they would rip the legs off of the runners and spectators in Boston.

The Quar’an is filled with commands to lie, kill and steal to maim and enslave non-believers. The media won’t tell us this because it would raise the question of why we are making believe all of this is untrue.

In three minutes anyone can find this material on line. It is a certainty that those who tell us Islam is a “religion of peace” are lying and know they are lying. The question is always, what can we do about it?

When Will Gays Pay “their Fair Share”?

gay pride flag 3 SC When will gays pay “their fair share”?

There is an increasing trend toward higher health insurance rates for those who are overweight and live “unhealthy” lifestyles as defined by insurance companies and employers. As the thinking goes, the obese and others (usually smokers) are automatically viewed as chronically unhealthy and above-average consumers of healthcare services.

Whether this is true for a particular person or not has become irrelevant.  More premium money has to be collected from somewhere, and neither the cowardly insurance companies nor our feckless politically correct corporate leaders will demand higher premiums from homosexuals whose risky lifestyle is well-established as a cause of serious illnesses that are costly to treat.

The ethics of this position be damned – they just don’t have the courage to face the storm that would follow an honest recalibration of insurance rates. They just aren’t interested in practicing the liberals’ favorite pursuit of making everyone “pay his fair share.” That only applies to smokers and the obese who are straight – they’re unable to fight back. Nevertheless, shouldn’t those who consume more healthcare resources be made to contribute more in premiums and “pay their fair share?”

A recent survey of 135 corporate decision makers found that 62% (up from 48% in 2005)  agreed that “unhealthy” workers (including smokers and the obese) should be made to pay higher health insurance premiums.

Walmart makes the smokers among its workforce pay $40.00 a month more for the health care coverage it offers. Since 2009, Clarion Health Partners has charged its employees with high cholesterol, high blood pressure, and/or overweight problems as much as $60.00 a month to meet the costs of health care for them.

The list of companies taking this position goes on and on.  Some employers have started regular on-site weigh-ins to “catch” their overweight workers  and charge them more for healthcare coverage. Despite their very risky behavior, homosexuals are never asked to pay more for their coverage. Others are made to cover the real costs of their doctor visits.

The chronic and acute illnesses male and female homosexuals suffer from are not only more numerous and far more serious, but much more costly as well.

Black Teens Kill White Baby; Media Silent

baby Black Teens Kill White Baby; Media Silent

Take a minute and try to imagine what would happen in this country if the following scenario had taken place:

A report describes how in broad daylight two white teenage boys tried to rob a black Brunswick, Georgia woman at gunpoint as she was peacefully pushing her 13 month old son in his stroller. When she resisted, pleading “I don’t have any money,” they callously shot and killed the baby.

The gun did not “go off by accident.” The white thug meant to shoot the black woman and did just that, hitting her twice, THEN turned the gun on the baby. A white thug calmly walked over to the stroller and shot the innocent black baby in the face.

Putting aside her own pain and fear, the loving black mother desperately tried to save her baby’s life by giving him CPR; but the helpless innocent child, shot in the face by a white assailant, died anyway.

We don’t have to imagine how the media would cover this story because unfortunately, except for the race of the killers and their victims which have been reversed, everything else in this scenario is true and actually happened.

Is there any doubt that if the killers were white, the New York Times would change its masthead to read “WHITES HATE AFRICAN AMERICANS ENOUGH TO KILL THEIR BABIES!” and keep it that way for two weeks? Where is the righteous indignation of the white media in this revolting black adult-on-white baby murder?  Where are the stories reminding readers that the New Black Panthers have consistently called for murdering white babies?

Is there any doubt that there would be wide brush accusations about white racial hatred coupled with calls for more affirmative action and slave reparations?

Where are the professionally aggrieved Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson?

Don’t hold your breath waiting for Jackson to descend on Brunswick chanting tired slogans about racism and the KKK. Sharpton is too busy making a fool of himself on his talk show to raise a voice in this case – the baby is white, after all. Neither of them has dredged up images of 80-year-old lynchings and beatings while beating his breast crying for “more gun control” to keep blacks safe from whites.

And the media? Its answer is: “We don’t cover black-on-white crime even when the victim is a baby – get over it.”

 

Video: Chicago To Indoctrinate Children With LGBT Sex-Ed

sex change Chicago To Indoctrinate Children With LGBT Sex Ed

Why would the Chicago Public School (CPS) system be so presumptuous as to start teaching Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual, and Transsexual Sex-Ed to all its students, even five year old kindergarteners? Aside from pure hubris, satisfying Gay political groups is a good guess; but the simple answer is because they can. The Chicago’s public schools are more than 85% black or Latino and just 8.8% white. A combined 87% of black and Hispanic Chicagoans live in poverty, so they are as dependent upon white liberals as house pets are to their owners.

If these numbers were reversed, the White ruling class in Chicago wouldn’t dare force this plan on its students; yet because they own Chicago’s minorities, they can treat them like house pets. It makes no difference what the conditions of the schools in Chicago are, or that they don’t teach their students basic skills. The White liberal ruling class tells its subjects where to live, what schools to attend, what will be taught, which stores they are allowed to shop in, and on and on.

Now Chicago’s White ruling class has decided bowing to Gay groups is more important than the innocence of its five year olds. There seems to have been no public hearings on this policy. There were no parents’ statements entered into the record about the plan. There was no discussion of how 5 year old kindergarten children would be affected by having their innocence wrenched away. Nobody asked how a child being taught the differences between normal sexuality and homosexuality was supposed to continue to believe in Santa Claus or the doctrines of his or her family religion. None of Chicago’s subjects was given a chance to ask CPS administrators if they were concerned about having teachers instruct grade school children about “Kama Sutra” positions. Was anyone concerned that homosexual teachers presenting LGBT material to five year olds is an ugly intrusion of the rights of parents?

Of course, the CPS uses the standard liberal excuse that the plan includes an “Opt out clause.” What about an affirmative “Opt in” clause? Oh, that might draw too little interest and force teachers to actually attempt to teach.

Photo credit: joshbousel (Creative Commons)