A Rift In Reagan’s Big Tent

In a two-party system, as the U.S. gratefully is, there must be a difference between the two major parties. The distinction seems to have eroded over the years as both parties have moved to the left. To those of us who ardently hold to the principles that this nation was founded upon, there is only one major party that at least has the temerity to articulate those ideals, whether it in fact practices them or not, and that is the Republican Party. Those of us who lament the downward slide of the country into statism, and toward eventual financial collapse, must decide whether we want to be part of the solution within the GOP, or continue to be part of the problem. Many who consider themselves to be “patriots” are part of the problem.

Many long-time Republicans are resistant to the efforts of the neophytes, or Tea Party idealists. They stand egocentrically on the ground that the Republican Party is “my” party” and refuse to let the neophyte conservatives have a place at the table. They roll out by-law and rule changes that seek to centralize the “power” and authority of the party in the hands of a few, rather than expanding and democratizing it and increasing participation. They attempt to demonize and denigrate the newcomers who, in my estimation, are the very embodiment of the same revolutionary spirit and convictions that founded our republic.

On the other hand, many of the newcomers attack the “old guard” with the same ferocity and animus they hold for those who are ideologically engaged in the process of fundamentally transforming the nation. Some of these Tea Partiers exacerbate the divide created by the egoism of the old guard and take this internal struggle to a level that, if taken to extremes, will fractiously render the GOP impotent, which would serve no one’s interest except the other Party and the real enemies of freedom. They engage in strident in-your-face confrontational coercion of “ideological purity” that only fans the flames of discord and apprehension of the establishment Republicans.

There is near universal acceptance within the GOP of the main tenets of the Tea Party movement, which are: eliminate excessive taxes, eliminate the national debt, eliminate deficit spending, protect free markets, abide by the Constitution of the United States, promote civic responsibility, and reduce the overall size of government.

The only difference, other than tactical, I can find between the two factions is an understanding of compromise. The old guard has been around long enough to know that everything in politics and government is incremental, and that compromise is critical. They just need to learn to compromise in a way that takes us in the right direction, not the other way. The newcomers have the luxury of standing strictly on principle, and, having never governed, have not had the educational experience to realize that it’s impossible in governance to have things exactly how you want them all of the time. It is possible to compromise on specific legislation or statute without compromising on your principles. Ignorance of this fact will cripple the neo-conservatives unless they learn to adapt.

What is clear is that the tactics of both factions are churlish, immature, and divisive. Both use labels to demonize and alienate the other and engage in tactics that are characteristic of Saul Alinsky devotees, not members of the Party of Lincoln. To both sides, I would reiterate the counsel of Paul: “When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.”

Ronald Reagan’s goal was for the Republican Party to be a big tent; the bigger, the better. I believe ardently that all who are at the eye of this intra-party storm are conservatives, believing in limited government, individual freedom, protection of life and private property, less government spending, and less governmental intrusion and centralization of power. So why should it matter if we’re constitutional conservatives, Tea Party conservatives, libertarian conservatives, or old guard conservatives? As Reagan said, “He who agrees with me 80% of the time is not my enemy.”

If the GOP is to succeed electorally, all factions and persons involved in the party schism must learn to work together. Only by working together can we begin to slow the abominable slide into leftist oblivion. The “old guard” and the Tea Partiers must realize that all brands of conservatives are essential spokes in the same wheel.

If the statists who’re fundamentally transforming the nation are to be defeated, then it will only come as a result of a “united we stand, but divided we fall” conviction. And if we’re not part of the solution to create such cohesiveness, we’re part of the problem of divisiveness and failure. Clearly, both factions are at fault; and both are diluting and dividing the positive electoral influence the GOP could be enjoying if they’d work together against the real enemies of the state, rather than those perceived internally to be.

When conservatives don’t get their way with the candidates of their choice, and choose to stay at home on election day, they get precisely what they despise the most: more centralized planning, more reckless spending, and more expansive intrusion of government in their private lives by handing the election to the opposition. In short, they get everything that is contrary to their convictions. It’s illogical and frankly just plain stupid to alienate and marginalize those who agree with you 90% of the time by treating them the same way as those who disagree 100% of the time. The best thing to do is vote in every election for the most conservative candidate. You are not “violating” your principles by so doing.

It matters less what kind of conservative labels we wear in our personal ideology than that all parties resolve to work together in defeating those whose beliefs are antithetical to our founding principles. If the newcomers are to inch the country back closer to our founding tenets, it’s going to come by nudging the Republican Party back to its conservative roots, not by a hostile takeover, or by splintering into separate, impotent parties. And if the establishment Republicans want to win elections, they’ve got to work with, not against, the Tea Party conservatives and begin harnessing their convictions and enthusiasm–and begin practicing better what they preach. And developing a backbone to stand up against the statists would go a long way toward developing some trust with the more conservative members.

A great starting point for all is adoption of Ronald Reagan’s 11th Commandment: “Thou shalt not speak ill of a fellow Republican,” and a determination to discontinue the divisive and deleterious speech, inferences, and actions. And for heaven’s sake, start talking with one another, rather than about one another!

One other thing is for certain: the other major Party is celebrating proportionally to the GOP’s divisiveness. The victories they can’t win on their own will be handed to them by a bifurcated Republican Party.

 

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom

"Loophole" from Obama's IRS: Protect your IRA or 401(k) with gold and silver... click here to get a NO-COST Info Guide >

Comments

  1. Sic Semper Tyrannis says:

    Maybe the real reason for the rift is that we patriots know just how truly despicably corrupt the GOP RINO Establishment and the federal US Mafia truly is…

    Let’s take a look at the corruption in the executive branch, particularly the current leader of the US Mafia Cabal of criminal Presidents that includes his son, “W” (Worthless???), the Clintons, the Obamas, and his son JEB who is being heavily promoted at the moment certainly not by coincidence in the US State Propaganda Ministry. Was former CIA Director, CIA Dallas Chief, JFK assassin, and President George H. W. Bush a Nazi spy, infiltrator, and usurper himself??? Remember, his father and maternal grandfather were both found guilty of supporting the Nazis. A detailed investigation of his genealogy will reveal that there are many inconsistencies, expunged records, and false information and that he is very likely not related to his alleged paternal grandfather, Samuel Prescott Bush. His father Prescott Sheldon Bush’s real name is George H. Scherf, Sr. and George Herbert Walker Bush’s real name is George H. Scherf, Jr. They were both Nazi spies. The President’s father, George H. Scherf, Sr., was the assistant for Nikola Tesla, who stole his secrets for the Nazis and even stole him blind which is one reason why Tesla died penniless and broke. Check out this photo of George H. Scherf, Jr. with his infamous Nazi buddies when they were younger. Apparently, Martin Bormann (Hitler’s 2nd in command), Dr. Josef Mengele (infamous SS Angel of Death, Reinhardt Gehlen (Chief SS officer and assassin), and Otto Skorzeny (Hitler’s bodyguard and SS assassin)were all friends of this President. They were all from a similar area of Germany near Leipzig. This was all revealed by Otto Skorzeny from his deathbed in Florida because he had been betrayed by this former President out of millions of dollars…

    “What you are about to read is another step beyond research pioneered in the early 90s by author/historian Webster Tarpley based largely on deathbed “clues” provided by former Hitler bodyguard Otto Skorzeny and his box of photographs. Since Skorzeny’s death in 1999, the various leads he provided have been followed up and tend to support what, at first blush, would appear to be the unbelievable rantings of an embittered old man. What remains constant as we pore through publicly available official records, private correspondence, memoirs, newspaper articles, photos and other “clues” is that Bush family records (the ones that exist) are a puzzle palace of inconsistencies and curiosities. Since it is a congressionally established fact that Prescott Bush was in business with the Nazis during WWII, we can safely say that the Bush/Nazi connection existed. Who are the Bushes? How did they get connected with the Nazis? Is the connection still alive through U.S. presidents George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush? The answers are not as literal as we would like them to be. But we have the testimony of Otto Skorzeny and his photos. So, here we go—the first installment of an investigation that points to a curious conclusion: The “Bush” family was created to destroy America.”
    http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20070405.htm

    This is a long read but well worth your time if you want to know just how deep the rabbit hole of corruption in the apostate US Mafia Government really goes. You will even see the deceptive German influence in the creation of the Federal Reserve.

Speak Your Mind

*